In this information era, it becomes increasingly difficult for conventional on-premises storage servers to deal with enterprises' explosive data growth. Table 1 details a comprehensive comparison between OBS and on-premises storage servers.
Item |
OBS |
On-Premises Storage Server |
---|---|---|
Storage capacity |
OBS provides storage capacity for massive amounts of data. All services and storage nodes are deployed in distributed clusters. You can expand a node or cluster separately, and the storage capacity will never be insufficient. |
Confined storage space due to limited capacity of hardware devices. You need to purchase extra disks and perform manual expansion. The storage capacity is eventually a limitation. |
Security |
OBS uses the HTTPS/SSL protocol and supports encryption for data uploads. In addition, OBS uses access key IDs (AKs) and secret access keys (SKs) to authenticate user identities. It also leverages IAM policies, bucket policies, access control lists (ACLs), and technologies such as uniform resource locator (URL) validation to ensure security for data transmission and access. |
Exposes the owner and users to security risks such as cyber attacks, technological vulnerabilities, and accidental operations. |
Costs |
OBS is an out-of-the-box service, which requires zero cost for physical devices. It also provides O&M services. |
Expensive hardware devices; long-term construction; difficulties in installation; high O&M costs. All these disadvantages of on-premises storage servers can impede the growth of enterprises. In addition, you may incur expenditure for security assurance. |